Gewählte Publikation:
SHR
Neuro
Krebs
Kardio
Lipid
Stoffw
Microb
NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery; STARSurg Collaborative.
A prognostic model for use before elective surgery to estimate the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (GSU-Pulmonary Score): a development and validation study in three international cohorts.
Lancet Digit Health. 2024; 6(7): e507-e519.
Doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00065-7
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
-
Andrianakis Alexandros
-
Belarmino Armin
-
Bele Uros
-
Brinskelle Petra
-
Castellani Christoph
-
Cohnert Tina Ulrike
-
Eder-Halbedl Andrea
-
Fediuk Melanie
-
Holzmeister Clemens
-
Kahn Judith
-
Leithner Andreas
-
Lindenmann Jörg
-
Lumenta David Benjamin
-
Michelitsch Birgit
-
Mikalauskas Saulius
-
Nischwitz Sebastian
-
Puchwein Paul
-
Roj Andrej
-
Schemmer Peter
-
Singer Georg
-
Smolle-Juettner Freyja-Maria
-
Till Holger
-
Wolf Axel
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- BACKGROUND: Pulmonary complications are the most common cause of death after surgery. This study aimed to derive and externally validate a novel prognostic model that can be used before elective surgery to estimate the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications and to support resource allocation and prioritisation during pandemic recovery. METHODS: Data from an international, prospective cohort study were used to develop a novel prognostic risk model for pulmonary complications after elective surgery in adult patients (aged ≥18 years) across all operation and disease types. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pulmonary complications at 30 days after surgery, which was a composite of pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and unexpected mechanical ventilation. Model development with candidate predictor variables was done in the GlobalSurg-CovidSurg Week dataset (global; October, 2020). Two structured machine learning techniques were explored (XGBoost and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO]), and the model with the best performance (GSU-Pulmonary Score) underwent internal validation using bootstrap resampling. The discrimination and calibration of the score were externally validated in two further prospective cohorts: CovidSurg-Cancer (worldwide; February to August, 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic) and RECON (UK and Australasia; January to October, 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic). The model was deployed as an online web application. The GlobalSurg-CovidSurg Week and CovidSurg-Cancer studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04509986 and NCT04384926. FINDINGS: Prognostic models were developed from 13 candidate predictor variables in data from 86 231 patients (1158 hospitals in 114 countries). External validation included 30 492 patients from CovidSurg-Cancer (726 hospitals in 75 countries) and 6789 from RECON (150 hospitals in three countries). The overall rates of pulmonary complications were 2·0% in derivation data, and 3·9% (CovidSurg-Cancer) and 4·7% (RECON) in the validation datasets. Penalised regression using LASSO had similar discrimination to XGBoost (area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC] 0·786, 95% CI 0·774-0·798 vs 0·785, 0·772-0·797), was more explainable, and required fewer covariables. The final GSU-Pulmonary Score included ten predictor variables and showed good discrimination and calibration upon internal validation (AUROC 0·773, 95% CI 0·751-0·795; Brier score 0·020, calibration in the large [CITL] 0·034, slope 0·954). The model performance was acceptable on external validation in CovidSurg-Cancer (AUROC 0·746, 95% CI 0·733-0·760; Brier score 0·036, CITL 0·109, slope 1·056), but with some miscalibration in RECON data (AUROC 0·716, 95% CI 0·689-0·744; Brier score 0·045, CITL 1·040, slope 1·009). INTERPRETATION: This novel prognostic risk score uses simple predictor variables available at the time of a decision for elective surgery that can accurately stratify patients' risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, including during SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. It could inform surgical consent, resource allocation, and hospital-level prioritisation as elective surgery is upscaled to address global backlogs. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
-
Humans - administration & dosage
-
Elective Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
-
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
-
Female - administration & dosage
-
Prognosis - administration & dosage
-
Middle Aged - administration & dosage
-
Male - administration & dosage
-
Prospective Studies - administration & dosage
-
Aged - administration & dosage
-
COVID-19 - epidemiology
-
Risk Assessment - methods
-
Adult - administration & dosage
-
Machine Learning - administration & dosage
-
Risk Factors - administration & dosage
-
Lung Diseases - etiology
-
Cohort Studies - administration & dosage