Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Kolland, M; Schreiber, N; Borenich, A; Hafner-Gießauf, H; Waller, I; Winkler, HM; Zitt, E; Zollner-Schwetz, I; König, E; Wagner-Skacel, J; Horn, S; Rosenkranz, AR; Kirsch, AH.
Vaccination acceptance and its associated factors in patients on hemodialysis in Austria: A nationwide survey.
Clin Nephrol. 2024; 101(2):49-58 Doi: 10.5414/CN111125
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Kirsch Alexander
Kolland Michael
Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Borenich Andrea
König Elisabeth
Rosenkranz Alexander
Schreiber Nikolaus
Wagner-Skacel Jolana
Zollner-Schwetz Ines
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Vaccines are essential in disease prevention among patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD). However, during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there has been an increased rate of vaccination hesitancy. A better understanding of patients' opinions may help identify a more targeted approach to increase vaccination rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires with 43 questions based on the recommendations of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy were administered to patients during routine HD sessions at different dialysis centers in Austria. RESULTS: In total, 347 patients participated in this study. Approximately 81% of the patients were aged > 54 years, and 65% were men. Further, 53% of patients were receiving HD from private units. In ~ 72% of patients, the dialysis physicians were the source of vaccination information. Meanwhile, the source of information in 28% of patients was the primary care physician (28%), and 18% of patients obtained vaccination details from the internet. The number of younger (aged < 55 years) patients who were more likely to use online content as the main source of information was significantly higher than that of older patients (32 vs. 15%, p = 0.001). Furthermore, the number of older patients who wanted to receive more information from the dialysis physician was significantly higher than that of younger patients (57 vs. 38%, p = 0.009). Only 65% of patients had a good understanding of the mechanisms of action of vaccines. The younger population (aged 18 - 54 years) had a higher number of individuals with a good understanding of vaccine mechanisms than the older population (78 vs. 62%, p = 0.016). Moreover, 86% of the whole population wanted to complete the recommended vaccinations. However, only 39% of respondents had sufficient information about the vaccination plan in Austrian. CONCLUSION: Numerous patients receiving HD wanted to obtain more information from their dialysis physicians. Increased awareness among providers and targeted communication might increase vaccination rates.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Male - administration & dosage
Humans - administration & dosage
Female - administration & dosage
Austria - administration & dosage
Vaccination - administration & dosage
Vaccines - administration & dosage
Surveys and Questionnaires - administration & dosage
Communication - administration & dosage

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
hemodialysis
vaccination
influences
© Med Uni Graz Impressum