Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal
Selected Publication:
SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb
Xiao, B; Qian, Z; Look-Why, SL; Piccolini, A; Dagnino, F; Korn, SM; Zurl, H; Pohl, KK; Stelzl, DR; Wollin, D; Trinh, QD; Kibel, AS; Cole, AP.
Prostate Biopsy and Malpractice: Analysis of a National Legal Database from 1995 to 2025.
Urology. 2025;
Doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.12.015
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-authors Med Uni Graz
- Pohl Klara Konstanze
- Zurl Hanna
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current evidence on prostate biopsy litigation risks, we analyze malpractice litigations related to prostate biopsies using a national legal database. METHODS: We utilized the LexisNexis Database to retrospectively analyze prostate biopsy malpractice lawsuits. We searched for keywords "prostate", "malpractice", and "biopsy" from January 1, 1995 to March 30, 2025. We focused on cases where the allegation of malpractice was specific to the biopsy, excluding cases addressing other aspects of prostate cancer care. We then reviewed case characteristics including type of biopsy, location, instigating injuries, allegations, verdict, and plaintiff award. RESULTS: We found 360 unique lawsuits, 24 of which met the inclusion criteria. 9 lawsuits involved transrectal prostate biopsy, while the rest were unspecified types. Out of the 47 instigating injuries named, the most common were infection (9/47), acute or chronic pain after biopsy (6/47), and erectile dysfunction (4/47), LUTS (4/47), and bleeding (4/47). 18 cases (75.0%) resulted in defendant verdict, while 1 (4%) resulted in plaintiff verdict with an award of $226,795.00. 1 case (4%) resulted in private settlement of unknown amount. 2 lawsuits (8%) were ongoing at the time of the study, and 2 (8%) had undocumented verdicts. CONCLUSIONS: Despite wide utilization of prostate biopsy in the past 30 years, prostate biopsy lawsuits were rare at the federal and state court levels. Majority of the cases arose from common injuries after biopsies, and most cases resulted in the favor of the defending physicians.