Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Deininger, C; Wagner, A; Wichlas, F; Rohde, E; Freude, T; Deluca, A; Fierlbeck, J; Holzleitner, M; Senck, S; Tempfer, H; Gimona, M; Traweger, A.
Anatomical implant region - a critical determinant for the osteogenic potency of small extracellular vesicles and rhBMP-2.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1): 359 Doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-03036-w [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed PUBMED Central FullText FullText_MUG

 

Leading authors Med Uni Graz
Deininger Christian
Co-authors Med Uni Graz
Rohde Eva
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
PURPOSE: Mechanical stabilization is crucial for bone healing, yet complex fractures, particularly osteoporotic or comminuted, remain challenging due to impaired implant osseointegration, resulting in implant loosening or non-unions. This study investigated whether co-application of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells (hUC-MSC-sEVs) with a low dose of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) could enhance screw implant osseointegration. METHODS: A novel small animal model was established to evaluate the effect of anatomical femur regions on screw integration. Six weeks postoperatively, bone formation and bone-implant contact were assessed by micro-computed tomography and descriptive histology. Biomechanical stability was determined using pull-out tests. RESULTS: Outcomes differed significantly between the proximal and distal implant locations, with no improvements in osseointegration observed in the distal region. In the proximal region, application of hUC-MSC-sEVs alone did not significantly improve osseointegration, whereas local application of 1.5 µg rhBMP-2 resulted in measurable biomechanical improvements. No additive or synergistic effects were observed when sEVs were co-administered with rhBMP-2. Descriptive histology supported these findings, demonstrating the most pronounced bone formation at the proximal site following rhBMP-2 treatment. CONCLUSION: hUC-MSC-sEVs did not enhance screw implant osseointegration and slightly reduced new bone formation. In contrast, a low dose of rhBMP-2 (1.5 µg) promoted implant integration, with no additive effect when combined with sEVs. Notably, the osteogenic effect of rhBMP-2 was observed only at the proximal femoral site, indicating that anatomical location critically influences implant osseointegration. These findings highlight the importance of considering anatomical region when evaluating osteoinductive treatments and implant materials in small animal models.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 - pharmacology
Recombinant Proteins - pharmacology
Animals - administration & dosage
Osseointegration - drug effects
Extracellular Vesicles - administration & dosage
X-Ray Microtomography - administration & dosage
Osteogenesis - drug effects
Transforming Growth Factor beta - pharmacology
Humans - administration & dosage
Mesenchymal Stem Cells - administration & dosage
Bone Screws - administration & dosage
Femur - surgery, diagnostic imaging
Biomechanical Phenomena - administration & dosage
Male - administration & dosage
Femoral Fractures - surgery
Fracture Healing - drug effects

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
Extracellular vesicles
Exosomes
Osseointegration
BMP-2
© Med Uni GrazImprint