Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Go directly to the nagivation.
Go directly to the content.

Navigation/Search

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Siebenhofer, A; Scott, AM; Avian, A; Terebessy, A; Mergenthal, K; Schaffler-Schaden, D; Bachler, H; Huter, S; Zelko, E; Murray, A; Guppy, M; Piccoliori, G; Streit, S; Jeitler, K; Flamm, M.
COVI-Prim international: Similarities and discrepancies in the way general practices from seven different countries coped with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Front Public Health. 2022; 10: 1072515 Doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072515 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

Leading authors Med Uni Graz: Avian Alexander; Siebenhofer-Kroitzsch Andrea
Co-authors Med Uni Graz: Jeitler Klaus
Altmetrics:
Dimensions Citations:
Plum Analytics:
Scite (citation analytics):
Abstract:: OBJECTIVES: General practitioners (GPs) are frequently patients' first point of contact with the healthcare system and play an important role in identifying, managing and monitoring cases. This study investigated the experiences of GPs from seven different countries in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: International cross-sectional online survey. SETTING: General practitioners from Australia, Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovenia and Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 1,642 GPs completed the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We focused on how well-prepared GPs were, their self-confidence and concerns, efforts to control the spread of the disease, patient contacts, information flow, testing procedures and protection of staff. RESULTS: GPs gave high ratings to their self-confidence (7.3, 95% CI 7.1-7.5) and their efforts to control the spread of the disease (7.2, 95% CI 7.0-7.3). A decrease in the number of patient contacts (5.7, 95% CI 5.4-5.9), the perception of risk (5.3 95% CI 4.9-5.6), the provision of information to GPs (4.9, 95% CI 4.6-5.2), their testing of suspected cases (3.7, 95% CI 3.4-3.9) and their preparedness to face a pandemic (mean: 3.5; 95% CI 3.2-3.7) were rated as moderate. GPs gave low ratings to their ability to protect staff (2.2 95% CI 1.9-2.4). Differences were identified in all dimensions except protection of staff, which was consistently low in all surveyed GPs and countries. CONCLUSION: Although GPs in the different countries were confronted with the same pandemic, its impact on specific aspects differed. This partly reflected differences in health care systems and experience of recent pandemics. However, it also showed that the development of structured care plans in case of future infectious diseases requires the early involvement of primary care representatives.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing): Humans - administration & dosage; Pandemics - administration & dosage; COVID-19 - epidemiology, prevention & control; Cross-Sectional Studies - administration & dosage; General Practice - administration & dosage; General Practitioners - administration & dosage
Find related publications in this database (Keywords): COVID-19; general practitioner (GP); public health; self-confidence; perception of risk