Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal
Selected Publication:
SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb
Kirnbauer, B; Jakse, N; Truschnegg, A; Dzidic, I; Mukaddam, K; Payer, M.
Is perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the case of routine surgical removal of the third molar still justified? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a split-mouth design.
Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26(10):6409-6421
Doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04597-5
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Leading authors Med Uni Graz
- Kirnbauer Barbara
- Co-authors Med Uni Graz
- Jakse Norbert
- Payer Michael
- Truschnegg Astrid
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- INTRODUCTION: Since antimicrobial resistance, caused by various factors including antibiotic overuse and abuse, is a severe challenge, the necessity of perioperative antibiotic prophylactic for surgical third molar removal remains a contentious topic. This study determined whether perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce surgical site infections (SSIs), swelling, and pain in the case of surgical removal of wisdom teeth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a split-mouth design. A study medication of 2 g amoxicillin, administered 1 h before the third molar removal, followed by 1.5 g each for the first 3 postoperative days, was compared with placebo medication. The primary outcome variable (SSI), secondary clinical parameters (swelling and trismus), and patient-centered outcome measures (bleeding, swelling, pain, and pain medication intake) were documented until postoperative day 7. Statistical analyses were done with a paired t test, t test for independent samples, Chi-square test, and McNemar test, including effect sizes. RESULTS: Primary outcome SSI, in total 11%, and clinical parameters swelling and trismus were not significantly different between the two groups. The patient-centered outcome measures (bleeding, swelling, and pain) did not significantly differ, except for postoperative bleeding in the EG on day 0. No significant result was found with pain medication intake postoperative on days 0-7. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative administration of oral antibiotics neither revealed additional benefits in patient-related outcome measures nor reduced postoperative complications compared with the placebo group indicated at routine surgical removal of noninflamed wisdom teeth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Taking antimicrobial resistance into account, clear recommendations for administering drugs, particularly antibiotics, are critical in oral surgery.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
- Amoxicillin - therapeutic use
- Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
- Antibiotic Prophylaxis - adverse effects
- Double-Blind Method - administration & dosage
- Edema - prevention & control
- Humans - administration & dosage
- Molar, Third - surgery
- Pain - administration & dosage
- Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
- Tooth Extraction - adverse effects
- Tooth, Impacted - surgery
- Trismus - drug therapy, prevention & control
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
- Third molar surgery
- Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis
- Oral surgery
- Antibiotics