Medizinische Universität Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid Metab Microb

Hohenberger, GM; Schwarz, AM; Weiglein, AH; Kuchling, S; Hauer, G; Berzins, U; Holter, M; Grechenig, C; Krassnig, R; Gansslen, A.
Morphological side differences of the hemipelvis.
J ANAT SOC INDIA. 2020; 69(4): 201-206. Doi: 10.4103/JASI.JASI_97_19
Web of Science FullText FullText_MUG

 

Leading authors Med Uni Graz
Hohenberger Gloria
Co-authors Med Uni Graz
Berzins Uldis
Hauer Georg
Holter Magdalena
Krassnig Renate
Kuchling Sabine
Schwarz Angelika
Weiglein Andreas
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:
Plum Analytics:


Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
Introduction: Differences of anatomical characteristics regarding side and gender have been the topic of interest in various recent studies. Studies have reported either significant or insignificant differences of the bony pelvis. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible gender and side differences of the pelvis in a cadaveric model. Material and Methods: Fifty human cadaver pelves, preserved by the use of Thiel's method, underwent measurement during this study. Diverse parameters were measured on both hemipelves by three surgeons. Analysis of the morphology of the acetabular cavity was performed by measuring its longitudinal, horizontal, and maximal diameters. Results: The distance between the anterior superior iliac spine and the posterior superior iliac spine (females: mean of 15.9 cm; males: mean of 16.9 cm) and the horizontal diameter of the acetabular cavity (females: mean of 4.5 cm; males: mean of 4.9 cm) were statistically significantly shorter in females than in males. The subpubic angle was significantly (P < 0.001) larger in females (mean 61.4 degrees; standard deviation [SD] 11.02 degrees; range 37 degrees-82 degrees) when compared to males (mean 45.5 degrees; SD 7.48 degrees; range 35 degrees-60 degrees). The vertical diameter of the obturator foramen was significantly (P = 0.002) smaller for the right (mean 3.1; SD 0.56; range 1.9-4.6) in comparison to the left side (mean 3.4; SD 0.57; range 2.5-5.2). Discussion and Conclusion: Overall, a clear gender difference was observed for typical gender-specific parameters, whereas the anatomy of the hemipelves showed no relevant side differences.

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
Gender differences
hemipelvis
morphologic differences
pelvis
side differences
© Med Uni GrazImprint