Selected Publication:
SHR
Neuro
Cancer
Cardio
Lipid
Metab
Microb
Klug, B; Rodler, C; Koller, M; Wimmer, G; Kessler, HH; Grube, M; Santigli, E.
Oral biofilm analysis of palatal expanders by fluorescence in-situ hybridization and confocal laser scanning microscopy.
J Vis Exp. 2011; (56): 2967
Doi: 10.3791/2967
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Leading authors Med Uni Graz
-
Santigli Elisabeth
-
Schinagl Barbara
- Co-authors Med Uni Graz
-
Kessler Harald
-
Koller Martin
-
Wimmer Gernot
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) of natural heterogeneous biofilm is today facilitated by a comprehensive range of staining techniques, one of them being fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We performed a pilot study in which oral biofilm samples collected from fixed orthodontic appliances (palatal expanders) were stained by FISH, the objective being to assess the three-dimensional organization of natural biofilm and plaque accumulation. FISH creates an opportunity to stain cells in their native biofilm environment by the use of fluorescently labeled 16S rRNA-targeting probes. Compared to alternative techniques like immunofluorescent labeling, this is an inexpensive, precise and straightforward labeling technique to investigate different bacterial groups in mixed biofilm consortia. General probes were used that bind to Eubacteria (EUB338 + EUB338II + EUB338III; hereafter EUBmix), Firmicutes (LGC354 A-C; hereafter LGCmix), and Bacteroidetes (Bac303). In addition, specific probes binding to Streptococcus mutans (MUT590) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (POGI) were used. The extreme hardness of the surface materials involved (stainless steel and acrylic resin) compelled us to find new ways of preparing the biofilm. As these surface materials could not be readily cut with a cryotome, various sampling methods were explored to obtain intact oral biofilm. The most workable of these approaches is presented in this communication. Small flakes of the biofilm-carrying acrylic resin were scraped off with a sterile scalpel, taking care not to damage the biofilm structure. Forceps were used to collect biofilm from the steel surfaces. Once collected, the samples were fixed and placed directly on polysine coated glass slides. FISH was performed directly on these slides with the probes mentioned above. Various FISH protocols were combined and modified to create a new protocol that was easy to handle. Subsequently the samples were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Well-known configurations could be visualized, including mushroom-style formations and clusters of coccoid bacteria pervaded by channels. In addition, the bacterial composition of these typical biofilm structures were analyzed and 2D and 3D images created.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
-
Bacterial Physiological Phenomena -
-
Biofilms -
-
Humans -
-
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods
-
Microscopy, Confocal - methods
-
Mouth - microbiology
-
Orthodontic Appliances - microbiology
-
Palatal Expansion Technique - instrumentation
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
-
Medicine
-
Issue 56
-
fluorescence in situ hybridization
-
FISH
-
confocal laser scanning microscopy
-
CLSM
-
orthodontic appliances
-
oral biofilm