Medizinische Universit├Ąt Graz - Research portal

Logo MUG Resarch Portal

Selected Publication:

SHR Neuro Cancer Cardio Lipid

Findl, O; Kriechbaum, K; Menapace, R; Koeppl, C; Sacu, S; Wirtitsch, M; Buehl, W; Drexler, W.
Laserinterferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens: a randomized trial.
Ophthalmology. 2004; 111(8):1515-1521
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Authors Med Uni Graz:
Wirtitsch Matthias
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To measure the axial movement of an accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) induced by ciliary muscle contraction after application of pilocarpine. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, patient- and examiner-masked trial with intrapatient comparison. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: One hundred ten eyes of 55 patients with age-related bilateral cataract. METHODS: This study was divided into 3 parts. In the first, the accommodating IOL (1CU) was compared with a 3-piece open-loop acrylic IOL that served as the control. In the second, to assess the effect of capsule fibrosis on the potential accommodating performance of the accommodating IOL, extensive polishing of the anterior capsule with a slit cannula was compared with standard surgery. In the third, the effect of a posterior capsulorhexis was compared with that of standard surgery. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was assessed with partial coherence interferometry, measured before and after topical application of pilocarpine 2%, and near visual acuity (VA) was evaluated 3 months after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pilocarpine-induced change in ACD. RESULTS: The accommodating IOL showed a forward movement under pilocarpine with a median amplitude of movement of -314 microm (95% confidence interval [CI]: -148 to -592), compared with the backward movement of 63 microm (95% CI: 161 to -41) for the open-loop control IOL (P = 0.001). Capsule polishing and a posterior capsulorhexis had no effect on IOL movement with the accommodating IOL. The median near VA with distance correction was 20/60. CONCLUSION: Pilocarpine induced a small but significant forward movement of the accommodating IOL. However, the amount of movement was calculated to result in a refractive change of <0.5 diopters (D) in most patients, reaching 1 D or slightly more in only single cases, with a large variability of movement. Neither polishing of the capsule bag nor a posterior capsulorhexis could enhance the accommodative ability.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Accommodation, Ocular - physiology
Aged - physiology
Aged, 80 and over - physiology
Ciliary Body - drug effects
Female - drug effects
Fibrosis - drug effects
Humans - drug effects
Interferometry - methods
Lasers - diagnostic use
Lens Capsule, Crystalline - pathology
Lenses, Intraocular - pathology
Male - pathology
Middle Aged - pathology
Miotics - pharmacology
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Smooth - drug effects
Pilocarpine - pharmacology
Prospective Studies - pharmacology
Visual Acuity - pharmacology

© Meduni GrazImprint