Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid

Achmadi, D; van der Meer, L; Sigafoos, J; Lancioni, GE; O'Reilly, MF; Lang, R; Schlosser, RW; Hodis, F; Green, VA; Sutherland, D; McLay, L; Marschik, PB.
Undergraduates' perceptions of three augmentative and alternative communication modes.
Dev Neurorehabil. 2015; 18(1):22-25
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Autor/innen der Med Uni Graz:
Marschik Peter
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:
Abstract:
To assess undergraduates' perceptions of three augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) modes. We showed 104 undergraduates a video clip of a person using each of the three AAC modes and asked them to rate each option in terms of perceived (a) intelligibility, (b) ease of acquisition, (c) effectiveness/acceptability, and (d) preference. The three AAC modes shown were (a) manual signing, (b) picture exchange, and (c) speech-generating device. Mean ratings for perceived intelligibility and effectiveness/acceptability were significantly higher for the speech-generating device. The speech-generating device and manual signing options were rated as being more preferred over picture exchange. Picture exchange was rated significantly higher on perceived ease of acquisition. Speech-generating devices were perceived to have greater social validity than manual signing and picture exchange.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Adult -
Communication Aids for Disabled - standards
Female -
Humans -
Perception -

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
Augmentative and alternative communication
developmental disability
manual signing
picture exchange
social validation
speech-generating device
undergraduates' perceptions
© Meduni Graz Impressum