Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid

Jung, RE; Al-Nawas, B; Araujo, M; Avila-Ortiz, G; Barter, S; Brodala, N; Chappuis, V; Chen, B; De Souza, A; Almeida, RF; Fickl, S; Finelle, G; Ganeles, J; Gholami, H; Hammerle, C; Jensen, S; Jokstad, A; Katsuyama, H; Kleinheinz, J; Kunavisarut, C; Mardas, N; Monje, A; Papaspyridakos, P; Payer, M; Schiegnitz, E; Smeets, R; Stefanini, M; Ten Bruggenkate, C; Vazouras, K; Weber, HP; Weingart, D; Windisch, P.
Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 Suppl 16(466):69-77
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Autor/innen der Med Uni Graz:
Payer Michael
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:
Abstract:
The aim of Working Group 1 was to address the influence of different local (implant length, diameter, and design) and systemic (medications) factors on clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes in implant dentistry. Focused questions on (a) short posterior dental implants (≤6 mm), (b) narrow diameter implants, (c) implant design (tapered compared to a non-tapered implant design), and (d) medication-related dental implant failures were addressed. Four systematic reviews were prepared in advance of the Consensus Conference and were discussed among the participants of Group 1. Consensus statements, clinical recommendations, and recommendations for future research were based on structured group discussions until consensus was reached among the entire expert Group 1. The statements were then presented and accepted following further discussion and modifications as required by the plenary. Short implants (≤6 mm) revealed a survival rate ranging from 86.7% to 100%, whereas standard implant survival rate ranged from 95% to 100% with a follow-up from 1 to 5 years. Short implants demonstrated a higher variability and a higher Risk Ratio [RR: 1.24 (95% CI: 0.63, 2.44, p = 0.54)] for failure compared to standard implants. Narrow diameter implants (NDI) have been classified into three categories: Category 1: Implants with a diameter of <2.5 mm ("Mini-implants"); Category 2: Implants with a diameter of 2.5 mm to <3.3 mm; Category 3: Implants with a diameter of 3.3 mm to 3.5 mm. Mean survival rates were 94.7 ± 5%, 97.3 ± 5% and 97.7 ± 2.3% for category 1, 2 and 3. Tapered versus non-tapered implants demonstrated only insignificant differences regarding clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. The intake of certain selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors is associated with a statistically significant increased implant failure rate. The intake of bisphosphonates related to the treatment of osteoporosis was not associated with an increased implant failure rate. It is concluded that short implants (≤6 mm) are a valid option in situations of reduced bone height to avoid possible morbidity associated with augmentation procedures; however, they reveal a higher variability and lower predictability in survival rates. Narrow diameter implants with diameters of 2.5 mm and more demonstrated no difference in implant survival rates compared to standard diameter implants. In contrast, it is concluded that narrow diameter implants with diameters of less than 2.5 mm exhibited lower survival rates compared to standard diameter implants. It is further concluded that there are no differences between tapered versus non-tapered dental implants. Certain medications such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors showed an association with a higher implant failure rate. © 2018 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
biological complications
clinical decision-making
dental implants
drug
endosseous implant
epidemiology
failure
humans
medication
meta-analysis
narrow diameter
osteotomy
randomized controlled trials
review
short dental implants
small dental implants
survival
© Meduni Graz Impressum