Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid

Frühauf, J; Leinweber, B; Fink-Puches, R; Ahlgrimm-Siess, V; Richtig, E; Wolf, IH; Niederkorn, A; Quehenberger, F; Hofmann-Wellenhof, R.
Patient acceptance and diagnostic utility of automated digital image analysis of pigmented skin lesions.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012; 26(3):368-372
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Autor/innen der Med Uni Graz:
Ahlgrimm-Siess Verena
Fink-Puches Regina
Frühauf Julia
Hofmann-Wellenhof Rainer
Leinweber Bernd
Quehenberger Franz
Richtig Erika
Schiefer-Niederkorn Anna
Wolf Ingrid
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:
Abstract:
Computerized analysis of pigmented skin lesions may help to increase diagnostic accuracy for melanoma, help to avoid unnecessary procedures and reduce health care costs. We evaluated both the patient acceptance and diagnostic utility of such an analysis tool in a real clinical setting. Two hundred nine consecutive patients (median age: 34 years, range: 2-73 years), who were concerned about a pigmented skin lesion, answered a questionnaire about their attitude towards computerized analysis and their confidence in the resulting findings. Using a dermoscopy analyser, their skin lesions (n = 219) were then grouped into the categories, benign, suspicious and malignant, and results were compared with those obtained by in-person examination of dermato-oncologic experts. More than half of the patients (n = 114) would accept the use of computer analysis for melanoma screening; although 16 (14.0%) patients would accept this method solely, 98 (86.0%) patients would prefer an additional in-person examination by a dermatologist. Of the 219 pigmented skin lesions, the dermoscopic experts rated 171 (78.1%) as benign, 36 (16.4%) as suspicious and 12 (5.5%) as malignant, whereas computer analysis revealed 102 (46.6%) benign, 78 (35.6%) suspicious and 39 (17.8%) malignant lesions. At the expense of specificity (48.8%), the sensitivity of computerized analysis was excellent (100%) and equal to that of in-person examination. Most patients would accept computer analysis for melanoma screening, some of them even without reservations. However, due to a high rate of false positive computer assessments, it cannot be recommended as a screening tool at this time. © 2011 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology © 2011 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Adolescent -
Adult -
Aged -
Carcinoma, Basal Cell - diagnosis
Child -
Child, Preschool -
Dermoscopy - methods
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods
Diagnosis, Differential -
Female -
Humans -
Infant -
Male -
Melanoma - diagnosis
Middle Aged -
Patient Acceptance of Health Care -
Pigmentation Disorders - diagnosis
Questionnaires -
Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis

© Meduni Graz Impressum