Gewählte Publikation:
SHR
Neuro
Krebs
Kardio
Lipid
Stoffw
Microb
Egger, F; Zweiker, D; Freynhofer, MK; Löffler, V; Rohla, M; Geppert, A; Farhan, S; Vogel, B; Falkensammer, J; Kastner, J; Pichler, P; Vock, P; Lamm, G; Luha, O; Schmidt, A; Scherr, D; Hammerer, M; Hoppe, UC; Maurer, E; Grund, M; Lambert, T; Tkalec, W; Sturmberger, T; Zeindlhofer, E; Grabenwöger, M; Huber, K; Austrian TAVI Group.
Impact of On-Site Cardiac Surgery on Clinical Outcomes After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11(21):2160-2167
Doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.015
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
-
Zweiker David
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
-
Scherr Daniel
-
Schmidt Albrecht
- Study Group Mitglieder der Med Uni Graz:
-
Marte Wolfgang
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
-
This study sought to investigate the outcome of high-risk and inoperable patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in hospitals with (iOSCS) versus without institutional on-site cardiac surgery (no-iOSCS).
Current guidelines recommend the use of TAVR only in institutions with a department for cardiac surgery on site.
In this analysis of the prospective multicenter Austrian TAVI registry, 1,822 consecutive high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVR were evaluated. A total of 290 (15.9%) underwent TAVR at no-iOSCS centers (no-iOSCS group), whereas the remaining 1,532 patients (84.1%) were treated in iOSCS centers (iOSCS group).
Patients of the no-iOSCS group had a higher perioperative risk defined by the logistic EuroSCORE (20.9% vs. 14.2%; p < 0.001) compared with patients treated in hospitals with iOSCS. Procedural survival was 96.9% in no-iOSCS centers and 98.6% in iOSCS centers (p = 0.034), whereas 30-day survival was 93.1% versus 96.0% (p = 0.039) and 1-year survival was 80.9% versus 86.1% (p = 0.017), respectively. After propensity score matching for confounders procedural survival was 96.9% versus 98.6% (p = 0.162), 93.1% versus 93.8% (p = 0.719) at 30 days, and 80.9% versus 83.4% (p = 0.402) at 1 year.
Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR in hospitals without iOSCS had a significantly higher baseline risk profile. After propensity score matching short- and long-term mortality was similar between centers with and without iOSCS.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
-
aortic stenosis
-
on-site cardiac surgery
-
TAVR
-
transfemoral