Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz
Gewählte Publikation:
SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb
Batchelor, TT; Mulholland, P; Neyns, B; Nabors, LB; Campone, M; Wick, A; Mason, W; Mikkelsen, T; Phuphanich, S; Ashby, LS; Degroot, J; Gattamaneni, R; Cher, L; Rosenthal, M; Payer, F; Jürgensmeier, JM; Jain, RK; Sorensen, AG; Xu, J; Liu, Q; van den Bent, M.
Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(26):3212-3218
Doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.2464
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
- Payer Franz
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- Purpose A randomized, phase III, placebo-controlled, partially blinded clinical trial (REGAL [Recentin in Glioblastoma Alone and With Lomustine]) was conducted to determine the efficacy of cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, either as monotherapy or in combination with lomustine versus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 325) with recurrent glioblastoma who previously received radiation and temozolomide were randomly assigned 2:2:1 to receive (1) cediranib (30 mg) monotherapy; (2) cediranib (20 mg) plus lomustine (110 mg/m(2)); (3) lomustine (110 mg/m(2)) plus a placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival based on blinded, independent radiographic assessment of postcontrast T1-weighted and noncontrast T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans. Results The primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different for either cediranib alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.50; two-sided P = .90) or cediranib in combination with lomustine (HR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.08; two-sided P = .16) versus lomustine based on independent or local review of postcontrast T1-weighted MRI. Conclusion This study did not meet its primary end point of PFS prolongation with cediranib either as monotherapy or in combination with lomustine versus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma, although cediranib showed evidence of clinical activity on some secondary end points including time to deterioration in neurologic status and corticosteroid-sparing effects. (C) 2013 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
- Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy
- Female -
- Follow-Up Studies -
- Glioblastoma - drug therapy
- Humans -
- International Agencies -
- Lomustine - administration & dosage
- Male -
- Middle Aged -
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy
- Prognosis -
- Quinazolines - administration & dosage
- Survival Rate -