Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Wagner-Skacel, J; Bengesser, S; Dalkner, N; Mörkl, S; Painold, A; Hamm, C; Pilz, R; Rieger, A; Kapfhammer, HP; Hiebler-Ragger, M; Jauk, E; Butler, MI; Reininghaus, EZ.
Personality Structure and Attachment in Bipolar Disorder.
Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11:410 Doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00410 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed PUBMED Central FullText FullText_MUG

 

Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Bengesser Susanne
Wagner-Skacel Jolana
Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Dalkner Nina
Hamm Carlo
Hiebler-Ragger Michaela
Jauk Emanuel
Kapfhammer Hans-Peter
Mörkl Sabrina
Painold Annamaria
Pilz Rene
Reininghaus Eva
Rieger Alexandra
Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:
Background: An impairment of self and interpersonal functioning has an impact on coping strategies, regulation of affect and stress. Little is known so far about the impairment of personality functioning in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this study is to assess the effects of personality structure and attachment in BD patients on the symptom burden. Methods: Forty-six patients with the diagnosis of BD were assessed by the 12-item Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQS), the short version of Experience in Close Relationship-revised (ECR-R-D), and the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI 18) to determine the level of personality functioning, attachment patterns, and symptom load. Results: We observed positive correlations between personality difficulties, insecure attachment, and symptom load in patients with BD. A low level of structural integration and an insecure attachment style in patients with BD were accompanied by a significantly higher symptom load (r = 0.66, p ≤ 0.01). Interestingly, there were no significant differences in the structural integration (T(1.44) = -0.93, p = 0.357) and in the attachment style attachment related avoidance: (T(1,44) = 1.50, p = 0.140); attachment related anxiety (T(1,44) = -0.781, p = 0.439) of study participants with BD when compared to the normative value of the general population. Limitations: Our limitations are the small sample size of our group and the lack of a control group. Conclusion: In general, our results suggest that there is a link between personality structure and affective dynamics including depressive, anxiety, and somatization symptoms in BD. These findings underline the increasing importance of assessing personality structure and attachment for diagnosis and treatment planning of BD.

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
bipolar disorder
personality structure
attachment
global symptom load
psychotherapy
© Med Uni Graz Impressum