Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz

Logo MUG-Forschungsportal

Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Parvizi, D; Friedl, H; Schintler, MV; Rappl, T; Laback, C; Wiedner, M; Vasiljeva, A; Kamolz, LP; Spendel, S.
Use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate together with a self-adhering mesh (Dermabond™ Prineo™) for skin closure following abdominoplasty: an open, prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical study.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013; 37(3):529-537 Doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0123-3
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG


Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Parvizi Daryousch
Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
Kamolz Lars-Peter
Laback Christian
Rappl Thomas
Schintler Michael
Spendel Stephan
Vasilyeva Anna
Wiedner Maria

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abdominoplasty is one of the most commonly performed procedures in plastic surgery. The appearance of the scar is a major factor that contributes to the aesthetic outcome of the procedure and depends largely on the technique of wound closure. The new Prineo™ wound closure system was introduced to combine the effectiveness of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond™) together with a self-adhering mesh. Fifty-two women and eight men aged between 21 and 65 years who were scheduled for abdominoplasty were included in the study. The total operating times after abdominoplasty of the traditional wound closure technique and the Prineo™-type wound closure technique were compared. Furthermore, an analysis comparing the cost of the two methods was performed. Two weeks after surgery the wounds were examined and graded using the Hollander Cosmesis Scale. At the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the aesthetic outcome of the abdominal scar was evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale. Twelve months after surgery, the patients were asked to answer their part of the Patient Scar Assessment Scale. The mean total operating time for the new skin closure system was statistically significantly shorter than that of intradermal sutures. The mean price difference per patient was 104.27<euro> (134.79$) in favor of Prineo™. The Hollander Cosmesis Scale indicated a significantly more favorable overall result with Prineo™ at 2 weeks after surgery. The Vancouver Scar Scale demonstrated a better cosmetic outcome in favor of Prineo™ 6 and 12 months after surgery. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale scores 12 months after surgery indicated that the patients noted significantly less pain, thickness, and irregularity with Prineo™. Based on our results, we conclude that Prineo™ is a safe and effective substitute for superficial skin closure, with good cosmetic results and no increase in wound complications. The use of Prineo™ decreases operative time and cost and enhances the patient's postoperative comfort. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors .
Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
Abdominoplasty -
Adult -
Aged -
Cicatrix - prevention & control
Cyanoacrylates - therapeutic use
Female -
Humans -
Male -
Middle Aged -
Pain Measurement -
Prospective Studies -
Surgical Mesh -
Tissue Adhesives - therapeutic use
Wound Closure Techniques -
Young Adult -

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)
Dermabond (TM)
Wound closure
© Med Uni Graz Impressum