Gewählte Publikation:

SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb

Weber, T; Wassertheurer, S; Schmidt-Trucksäss, A; Rodilla, E; Ablasser, C; Jankowski, P; Lorenza Muiesan, M; Giannattasio, C; Mang, C; Wilkinson, I; Kellermair, J; Hametner, B; Pascual, JM; Zweiker, R; Czarnecka, D; Paini, A; Salvetti, M; Maloberti, A; McEniery, C.
Relationship Between 24-Hour Ambulatory Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Left Ventricular Mass: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
Hypertension. 2017; 70(6):1157-1164 Doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09917 [OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science PubMed FullText FullText_MUG

 

Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz

Zweiker Robert

Altmetrics:

Dimensions Citations:

Plum Analytics:

Scite (citation analytics):

Abstract:

We investigated the relationship between left ventricular mass and brachial office as well as brachial and central ambulatory systolic blood pressure in 7 European centers. Central systolic pressure was measured with a validated oscillometric device, using a transfer function, and mean/diastolic pressure calibration. M-mode images were obtained by echocardiography, and left ventricular mass was determined by one single reader blinded to blood pressure. We studied 289 participants (137 women) free from antihypertensive drugs (mean age: 50.8 years). Mean office blood pressure was 145/88 mm Hg and mean brachial and central ambulatory systolic pressures were 127 and 128 mm Hg, respectively. Mean left ventricular mass was 93.3 kg/m², and 25.6% had left ventricular hypertrophy. The correlation coefficient between left ventricular mass and brachial office, brachial ambulatory, and central ambulatory systolic pressure was 0.29, 0.41, and 0.47, respectively (P=0.003 for comparison between brachial office and central ambulatory systolic pressure and 0.32 for comparison between brachial and central ambulatory systolic pressure). The results were consistent for men and women, and young and old participants. The areas under the curve for prediction of left ventricular hypertrophy were 0.618, 0.635, and 0.666 for brachial office, brachial, and central ambulatory systolic pressure, respectively (P=0.03 for comparison between brachial and central ambulatory systolic pressure). In younger participants, central ambulatory systolic pressure was superior to both other measurements. Central ambulatory systolic pressure, measured with an oscillometric cuff, shows a strong trend toward a closer association with left ventricular mass and hypertrophy than brachial office/ambulatory systolic pressure. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01278732. © 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)

Adolescent -

Adult -

Aged -

Aged, 80 and over -

Arterial Pressure - physiology

Blood Pressure - physiology

Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods

Brachial Artery -

Circadian Rhythm - physiology

Echocardiography -

Female -

Follow-Up Studies -

Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging

Heart Ventricles - physiopathology

Humans -

Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular - diagnosis

Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular - physiopathology

Male -

Middle Aged -

Prospective Studies -

Systole -

Young Adult -

Find related publications in this database (Keywords)

blood pressure

blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory

echocardiography

hypertrophy, left ventricular

multicenter study

© Med Uni Graz • Impressum