Medizinische Universität Graz Austria/Österreich - Forschungsportal - Medical University of Graz
Gewählte Publikation:
SHR Neuro Krebs Kardio Lipid Stoffw Microb
Stolz, E; Burkert, N; Großschädl, F; Rásky, É; Stronegger, WJ; Freidl, W.
Determinants of Public Attitudes towards Euthanasia in Adults and Physician-Assisted Death in Neonates in Austria: A National Survey.
PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0124320-e0124320
Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124320
[OPEN ACCESS]
Web of Science
PubMed
FullText
FullText_MUG
- Führende Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
- Freidl Wolfgang
- Stolz Erwin
- Co-Autor*innen der Med Uni Graz
- Burkert Nathalie
- Großschädl Franziska
- Rasky Eva
- Stronegger Willibald
- Altmetrics:
- Dimensions Citations:
- Plum Analytics:
- Scite (citation analytics):
- Abstract:
- Euthanasia remains a controversial topic in both public discourses and legislation. Although some determinants of acceptance of euthanasia and physician-assisted death have been identified in previous studies, there is still a shortage of information whether different forms of euthanasia are supported by the same or different sub-populations and whether authoritarian personality dispositions are linked to attitudes towards euthanasia. A large, representative face-to-face survey was conducted in Austria in 2014 (n = 1,971). Respondents faced three scenarios of euthanasia and one of physician assisted death differing regarding the level of specificity, voluntariness and subject, requiring either approval or rejection: (1) abstract description of euthanasia, (2) abstract description of physician-assisted suicide, (3) the case of euthanasia of a terminally-ill 79-year old cancer patient, and (4) the case of non-voluntary, physician assisted death of a severely disabled or ill neonate. A number of potential determinants for rejection ordered in three categories (socio-demographic, personal experience, orientations) including authoritarianism were tested via multiple logistic regression analyses. Rejection was highest in the case of the neonate (69%) and lowest for the case of the older cancer patient (35%). A consistent negative impact of religiosity on the acceptance across all scenarios and differential effects for socio-economic status, area of residence, religious confession, liberalism, and authoritarianism were found. Individuals with a stronger authoritarian personality disposition were more likely to reject physician-assisted suicide for adults but at the same time also more likely to approve of physician-assisted death of a disabled neonate. Euthanasia in adults was supported by a partially different sub-population than assisted death of disabled neonates.
- Find related publications in this database (using NLM MeSH Indexing)
- Adolescent -
- Adult -
- Aged -
- Attitude to Death -
- Attitude to Death -
- Cross-Sectional Studies -
- Euthanasia - psychology
- Female -
- Humans -
- Interviews as Topic -
- Male -
- Middle Aged -
- Multivariate Analysis -
- Physicians - psychology
- Public Opinion -
- Suicide, Assisted -
- Surveys and Questionnaires -
- Young Adult -